Four P's in Foreign Policy

By analyzing the contend on Iraq using the 4 Ps framework apt(p) by Bruce W. Jentleson in his Book American Foreign Policy, it seems that the US national interest goal cannot be simultaneously snug in most of the cases. Iraq became a US terror in 1990 when former Iraqi dictator, ibn Talal Hussein Hussein, led the invasion of Kuwait. US, back up by the coupled Nations and m whatever other countries, went to war for the inaugural time against Iraq. The US troops expelled the Iraqi troops start of Kuwait and reestablished order in that country. This did not mean that the terror was over; Saddam Hussein became an enemy of the fall in States.

After the terrorist attacks in the United States, President George Bush started a war on terror, a war which main purpose is to finish any kind of threats all over the world. According to President Bush, Saddam Hussein with his anti-American sentiment and the possession of biological and chemic weapons was one of these threats. The proposal of a new war against Iraq came from George Bush. This war was supposed to be based on the core goals of American Foreign Policy (The 4 Ps).

Power: Iraq was considered as one of the biggest enemies of the United States, more than the country itself; the enemy was its leader, Saddam Hussein.



An active threat could not only harm US allies in the Middle East but also other countries in the world, even America. The risk was too big and some actions should be taken. America should protect itself and its interests.

Peace: Iraq could also deter world peace as it did before. Saddam Husseins greed and power could result in another invasion to a Middle Eastern country. The United States had also a big responsibility in this aspect, as one...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.