History as a Series of Stories

Anyone with even the most vent knowledge of American history knows about this event, knows about the capital of Massachusetts tea Party. But vernal goes beyond the elementary-school version to hire what the event would have meant to those who participated in it - as well as in other events of the American variety. Did they understand at the epoch the significance of their conductions? Is it ever possible to understand in the heartbeat the importance of a single event? Would a feel of the importance of what they were doing have made them act differently from the carriage in which they did? Did a sense of the importance of what they were doing open them act the way that they did?

girlish's cargonful analysis suggests that in large standard those who participated in the American Revolution had only an inexact sense of the importance of their actions - and in this way they were like the rest of us, doing the top hat that we can in the moment, hoping that the future will judge our actions to be the right thing. But what makes this analysis compelling is that Young focuses on George Robert Twelves Hewes, a shoemaker who took part in a identification number of revolutionary events in capital of Massachusetts. In 1835, when he was in his 90s and the domain was entering its second half-century, he was rediscovered and feted as one of the concluding survivors both o

Those who were at Lexington or at Griffin's Harbor could have no sense of how of the essence(p) their actions would be. They hoped to make a difference, exactly history is the connected stories of those actions that did make a difference, not simply those actions that people hoped would be effective. store includes that sense of having done the best that one can bit history gives little regard to failed efforts.

We have been taught that history is what happened in the other(prenominal) and that later interpretations are all, more or less, false. They are overlays that prevent us from seeing clearly what is true.

But Young argues that history is both the past and the ways in which that past serves a series of different presents. One Boston Tea Party belongs to the George Hewes who blackened his face and boarded a ship in 1773. A different Boston Tea Party belonged to Hewes in his 90s, when he was held up as a hero of a revolution fading into history. And a different one belongs to us now. History is a set of facts that do not change, but it is equally the meaning applied to those facts, and that meaning does change as the unchanging past serves the needs of the ever-changing present.

f the Boston Tea Party and of the revolutionary generation. AS the community passed its fiftieth birthday and most of those who had actually made history had died, the nation began to shore up the memories of those days.

But weighed against this careful sifting of set downs, Young argues, is the eternize created along the way. The history of the American Revolution is the record of what happened at the end of the 18th century. But it is also the record of the what the American Revolution meant when the nation turned 50, what the American Revolution meant in 1861, in 1865, during the Spanish-American War, in the trenches of the Western Front, when Neil Armstrong made tha
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.